Jewish Ideas Daily has been succeeded and re-launched as Mosaic. Read more...

Did Red Bull Stratos Break a Halakhic Barrier?

Not long ago, much of the world watched as Austrian skydiver Felix Baumgartner—working for a project called Red Bull Stratos, sponsored by the eponymous energy drink company—jumped to earth from a 24-mile-high helium balloon in a record-setting free fall that broke the sound barrier.  The feat set YouTube records and scored an advertising coup for Red Bull.  Yet there remains a critical question about this performance by what one magazine called the "God of the Skies": did it violate Jewish theological or halakhic norms? 

Relevant Links
Mensch in the Moon  Joshua Gelernter, Jewish Ideas Daily. We know about the contributions of Neil Armstrong and Werner Von Braun.  But what about an aerodynamics engineer named Abe Silverstein?

When space travel first began, Jewish scholars debated its propriety.  The detractors quoted Scripture: "The heavens belong to God, and earth He gave to man."  God gave humankind permission to use Earth's resources, they argued, but had granted no such permission regarding the upper atmosphere, let alone space.  Some repeated the cautionary tale of the Tower of Babel, whose builders foolishly said, in one talmudic version, "Let us go up (to the sky) and settle there" (Sanhedrin 109a).  Others cited Isaiah's condemnation of Nebuchadnezzar: "You said in your heart 'I will climb the clouds, I will be like a High One'—but you will be dragged down to the pit . . . .” (Isaiah 14:13-15)  Space travel was seen as an act of hubris, descended from ancient fetishes with moons and stars, a modern secular religion.   

Yet other Jewish theologians heartily supported space travel.  When Neil Armstrong walked on the moon, Rabbi Menachem Kasher published a work titled Ha'adam 'al Hayarei'ah, "Man on the Moon," which called the feat a work of Divine Providence.  He was moved by the Apollo 8 astronauts' reading biblical verses of creation when they orbited the moon and saw Earth rise above its horizon, but he also saw America’s victory in the moon race as a defeat for the secularist Soviets and a potential messianic herald for the embattled Jewish state. 

Perhaps more cogently, Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik saw space travel as a manifestation of a God-given instinct to understand the cosmos.  True, as the Psalmist says, "The Earth is the Lord's."  But "to whom," Soloveitchik asked, "did God grant this earth and its fullness?"  He gave this answer: 

To man who studies and comprehends the cosmic drama.  Ownership of the stars, the planets, the dark interplanetary or interstellar spaces, is granted by the Almighty only to those whom make the effort to understand them, to those who are curious about them.

This divinely-mandated conquest, moreover, was not merely intellectual but emotional: "Man is not satisfied sending up unmanned vehicles to gather scientific data.  He is eager to do it himself."  

Not surprisingly, a halakhic literature emerged, particularly after Ilan Ramon became the first Israeli astronaut, relating to questions of ritual observance in space (When do you pray or observe Shabbat when there is no day or night?).  Yet Soloveitchik also asserted, repeatedly, that halakhah sometimes requires man to retreat from his attempted conquests.  One obvious reason is the commandment to preserve one's health.  Moses' exhortation, "Take utmost care and watch yourselves scrupulously," (Deuteronomy 4:15) was understood as directed not only toward spiritual excellence but to bodily health.  "Never should a person stand in a place of danger," declares the Talmud (Shabbat 32a). 

Whether risk-taking is halakhically permissible depends on two factors: prevailing perceptions of the risk and the motivation for the action.  Society accepts certain risks with equanimity; taking such risks is allowed.  Thus, we drive cars, fly on planes, and even undergo anesthesia for elective surgery because the danger is widely perceived as acceptably small.  There is disagreement over whether bungee-jumping and other extreme sports fall into the permissible category.  

The prohibition on self-endangerment was cited by Rabbi Menashe Klein as one reason to ban space travel.  Many would disagree, citing NASA’s attempts to minimize the risks; but few would argue that society accepts as minimal the risks of breaking the sound barrier in a free-fall.  

Certain types of self-endangerment are halakhically permissible because the motivation behind the act is meritorious.  Serving in war, donating a kidney, or settling dangerous parts of Israel is allowed because one is trying to accomplish a mitzvah.  On these grounds, space travel has been deemed permissible because it aims at a high, even noble goal.  When the goal is to earn a livelihood, scholars debate the extent to which individuals may do dangerous jobs, like ice road trucking.  Limited risks are allowed reluctantly, and only when necessary.    

Beyond such acts, however, self-endangerment is prohibited.  One who unnecessarily endangers himself, Rabbi Moshe Rivkash explained, "despises the will of his Creator and does not want to serve Him."

What noble goal was achieved by Red Bull Stratos?  Its mission, says its website, was to "transcend human limits."  Beyond this general statement, what knowledge was sought from the experience?  "To provide valuable medical and scientific research data for future pioneers," the sponsors say, answering questions like, what would happen if a human falling faster than the speed of sound encountered an emergency?  

In other words, the purpose of this trip was . . . to make another such trip possible. 

Many have expressed doubt that this stunt had real scientific value, even for air or space travelScientists affiliated with the project insist there will be scientific benefits; I suppose time will tell.  I'm no scientist, but I remain skeptical that any such benefits will justify the risks of what was clearly a publicity-seeking stunt; moreover, such stunts may set perilous precedents for future advertisers and amateur daredevils.  Red Bull Stratos seems another example of "living on the edge" so as to distract ourselves from the challenge of living with meaning. 

Because of weather delays, the Red Bull Stratos launch was delayed until just a few days before the Shabbat when the world's Jews read about the Tower of Babel.  That Torah reading, one hopes, reminded us that humanity's loftiness consists not in ascents to the Heavens but in dedicating our lives toward Heavenly actions on Earth. 

Rabbi Shlomo M. Brody teaches at Yeshivat Hakotel, writes the Ask the Rabbi column for the Jerusalem Post, and directs the Tikvah Israel Seminars for Post-High School Students.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


B.K. JOHN on November 2, 2012 at 7:03 am (Reply)
Hosea chapter 4 words 1to3, Hear the word of the LORD, ye children of Israel: for the LORD HATH A CONTROVERSY with the inhabitants of the land, because there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of GOD IN THE LAND. bY SWEARING, AND LYING, and killing, and stealing, and commetting adulttery, they break out, and blood toucheth blood. There for shall the land mourn,....................... the sea also shall be take away. B.K. JOHN.
shushan on November 2, 2012 at 9:53 am (Reply)
how can a goy viloate Jewish laws when a goy isnt required to follow jewish laws
DF on November 2, 2012 at 12:45 pm (Reply)
For some, the imperative to preserve one's life can be, and often is, confused with nanny-state over-reach. The anti-smoking brigades, and the annual Purim ritual of killjoy "public service announcements" denouncing drinking come to mind. The above-quoted verse is regularly cited, and, just as regularly, roundly ignored, even or perhaps especially by entire communities otherwise quite observant. Why? Because most people have an inherent sense of knowing what is authentic tradition/halacha, and what is just an agenda dressed up in verses or citations to give it the veneer of halacha.

Besides, there is a competing verse here. "...Fill the land and CONQUER IT." (Genesis 1:28) To my mind, that is a command to enjoy all that life has to offer, and to do that, it requires taking risk. Naturally there is a balance to be struck. But merely because something risky doesnt have scientific value doesnt mean it has no meaning. Life would be very dull for observant Jews were that yarstick ever to be adopted.
YM on November 2, 2012 at 2:48 pm (Reply)
This is the most ridiculous article I have ever seen in this website, and I am Orthodox.
    Lawrence A Dickerson on November 2, 2012 at 6:41 pm (Reply)
    To YM:I suspected that at some point an orthodox Jew would come along and be ashamed at the pettiness with which rabbinical Judaism and it's followers demonstrate at the narrow minded attempts to dictate the behaviors and words of the "faithful".I am not one for indulging in snarky remarks;however,the only ridiculous words on this page are yours.

    You may want to try to lighten up and take a broader view.Talmudic Phariseeism which has been and is responsible for the continued shrinking of the numbers of the faithful has long been trying to fit in with an enlightened religion but those rabbis won't let go of the orthodox philosophy.Holding onto archaic ideals,morals and ethics maintains the power structure and if the rabbi loses that he has lost everything;status,money and power.
      shalomyitz on November 5, 2012 at 11:02 am (Reply)
      Lawrence Dickerson,

      Your point undercut by the fact that Orthodox Judaism is the only
      branch of Judaism that is actually growing.....
Mark Solomon on November 2, 2012 at 8:24 pm (Reply)
It is my understanding that this feat provided important information to those who are designing the elevator that is planned to ascend to a point just outside the atmosphere where a space shuttle can pick up passengers going to the space station and/or the [planned] moon station.
shalomyitz on November 5, 2012 at 11:07 am (Reply)
"The heavens belong to God, and earth He gave to man."

The other arguments seem relevant... but, an argument based on this pasuk doesn't. Since when does shamayim (heavens) in this context refer to the literal sky or outer space? Isn't shamayim a spiritual locale, rather than a physical one?

Comments are closed for this article.

Like us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Pin us on Pintrest!

Jewish Review of Books

Inheriting Abraham