Jewish Ideas Daily has been succeeded and re-launched as Mosaic. Read more...

The Golem: Universal and Particular

Golem, Philippe Semeria.

The most famous and enduring of all Jewish legends is that of the golem, the artificial man. Indeed, with the possible exception of the demon Lilith, briefly pressed into service as a feminist icon, the golem remains the only post-biblical Jewish myth to be widely adopted by non-Jewish culture. Among its recent incarnations are a computer game that bears its name and the army of humanoids who populate James Cameron's film Avatar.

Relevant Links
The Golem of Prague & the Golem of Rehovoth  Gershom Scholem, Commentary. Why it is right and proper for a computer to be named after the Maharal’s humanoid.  
Golem  Moshe Idel, State University of New York Press. A book-length scholarly exploration of the sources behind the legend in their historical and intellectual contexts.  
A Song of Two Golems  Hagai Hitron, Haaretz. In June 2009, an opera opened in Prague about two fanciful creatures: the Maharal’s, and a high-tech clone designed to protect a futuristic Jerusalem. 

The roots of the legend are ancient: the Talmud claims that Adam himself—and thus, theologically speaking, all of humanity—was a golem until God breathed a soul into his nostrils. But the creature as we know it today has a much later and remarkably precise genealogy. He was born in late-16th-century Prague under the auspices of Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel, known as the Maharal, who, using kabbalistic magic, is said to have created a humanoid creature out of mud or clay to defend the Jews from their enemies.

From that point on, versions differ in both details and essentials. We are told that the golem was made out of mud, or ash, or perhaps simply dirt. He was brought to life by the application of magical amulets, or by mystical incantations, or by applying the Hebrew word emet ("truth") to his body, or by the recitation of the names of God, or, most intriguingly, by intoning the letters of the Hebrew alphabet just as, according to the medieval kabbalistic Book of Creation (Sefer Yetzirah), God created the world.

We do not have any real idea of what the golem looked like, or of his nature. Speculations run from an amorphous but vaguely humanoid blob of clay to a near-perfect simulacrum of a man, lacking only reason and free will. Was he simply crude matter with the appearance of life? Or a living creature whose formative materials happened to be crude matter, as Adam was before the divine breath? In other words, was he something wholly other, or merely an incomplete human being? Perhaps he was both, or neither.

The accounts of his end are similarly conflicted, leading in turn to divergent understandings of his significance. The most popular and widely known version is that, having successfully defended the Jews, the golem turned on his maker, wreaking havoc in the ghetto, terrifying its inhabitants, and eventually attacking the synagogue he had been created to defend. Thereupon the rabbi destroyed the work of his hands, returning it to the primordial mud whence it came. In a manner befitting the creature's birth, his destruction was accomplished (or perhaps not) by effacing the letter alef from the word emet, leaving the word met ("dead").

As it happens, this is a relatively late version of the legendary events. According to an earlier one, perhaps the oldest, the golem proved so powerful that the Holy Roman Emperor himself begged the Maharal to restrain him, promising in return to ensure the security of his Jewish subjects. The rabbi complied, and the golem sleeps to this day in some unknown corner of the Prague ghetto, waiting to be reawakened from his mystical hibernation when his people once again require a champion.

Such is the happy freedom of legends. Today, the golem remains quietly ubiquitous, but also opaque and elusive. While popular culture has successfully visualized and digested the vampire, the werewolf, the ghost, the unicorn, fairies, trolls, witches, and innumerable other ancient personifications of the uncanny and the impossible, the golem still has no concrete visual iconography. We all know that Dracula is Bela Lugosi and Frankenstein is Boris Karloff, but the only even vaguely memorable cinematic depiction of the golem is in a silent German Expressionist film now known mainly to historians, film buffs, and eccentrics.

And yet we find the golem himself everywhere: in books, television shows, movies, video games, comic books, even the works of science. Various commentators have pronounced him the progenitor of Frankenstein's monster, the Terminator, Superman, HAL 9000, and almost any other non-human entity that nonetheless displays vaguely human characteristics. As a universal metaphor, he outdoes even Faust as a symbol of the dark side of knowledge, enlightenment, and technology, if not of modernity itself. The golem has been the atomic bomb, the computer, biotechnology, industrial production, indeed any scientific advance that at one point or another has terrified the human race and sometimes its own creators.

As this suggests, it is the later of the two narratives of the golem's career—that of the creature gone mad who turned on his creator—that has decisively captured the common imagination. The reasons are obvious. The golem is one of the few monsters that are not obvious holdovers from pagan myth, and the first who was unambiguously man-made. In other words, he is unquestionably modern: the shadow image of a dawning mechanical and technological age in which, for the first time, the artificial would begin to take precedence over nature as the determinative force in human life.

Indeed, the golem emerged out of a topography as artificial as the modern world itself. Unlike his brethren (werewolves, vampires, et al.), he was not born out of the Teutonic black forests, those symbols of the terrifying indifference of nature. He is, instead, unmistakably urban. He is the minotaur at the heart of the labyrinthine city. In this sense, the golem has come to personify the fear that we are all becoming automatons in the grip of a mechanism that we cannot fully comprehend even as we know that it is of our own making, or at least the making of other human beings. Perhaps we see golems everywhere because they are indeed everywhere: the avatars of our artificial environment.

This, however, refers only to the universal or the common golem. For Judaism, the legend has a wholly other meaning. In Jewish hands, the golem legend is not a horror story, and the cautionary elements in it are subsidiary to a larger theme. The golem was no Frankenstein, let alone a Faustian stand-in, but an avenger created specifically to vanquish the enemies of the Jewish people and, in the legend's compelling early version, awaiting future summonses to the same service.

A simple revenge fantasy, then? Not quite. Consider the nature of the golem himself. Most cultures build their heroes and avengers out of their idealized selves: their Galahads. But the golem is in every way the antithesis of the ideals of traditional Judaism. In a culture that revered learning and wisdom, the golem is stupid and incapable of reason. In a culture defined by the rigorous discipline of religious law, the golem is unruly, savage, and incapable of self-control. In a culture that took pride in its pacifism, the golem is created expressly for the purpose of committing acts of violence.

So contrary is the golem to the ideals of Jewish tradition that in Jewish circles his name eventually became an insult. To refer to someone as a "golem" is, essentially, to call him an idiot and a fool. The full implications of the insult are suggested by its elective affinity to another term of abuse: goyishe kop, or "Gentile head," referring to someone of notably low intelligence.

Beyond mere chauvinism, it seems, both terms express a contradiction in the Jewish self-image, what might be called the Gentile at the heart of the Jew. The golem embodies action, power, liberating: qualities officially eschewed but, through the medium of fantasy, projected onto a creature that lives and yet does not live, just as these same qualities lived and yet did not live in the psyche of his creators. This is a creature, moreover, given life not only by the wisdom and knowledge of the Jew but by his rage, his thirst for retribution, his hatred of the life he is forced to endure in exile: a life that appears to be life, but is not.

The Jewish golem, then, emerges as a reification not of the horrors of technology or the inhuman architecture of modern existence but rather of the suppressed forces that Judaism historically preferred to hide from itself: forces that, out of the sheer necessity of survival, eventually erupt, creating a new, Promethean form of life. It is not a coincidence that the awakened golem appears at the dawn of modernity as a close contemporary of the false messiah Shabbetai Tzvi, who unleashed another and much more explicit eruption of the same forces. Indeed, for the Jewish people, modernity has consisted of more than one awakening of the golem.

Whatever may be the universal afterlife of the Maharal's golem, for Jews and for Judaism the legend foreshadows something very particular: the reacquisition of the capacity for historical power and agency, which is to say the capacity for creation as well as for destruction. It is a capacity that is not to be trifled with—whose exercise, as the legend implicitly recognizes, demands vigilance and discipline. But without it, existence itself lies fallow, formless and void.

Benjamin Kerstein, who lives in Israel, is senior writer for the New Ledger.  

Tags: , , ,


Independent Patriot on September 14, 2010 at 8:17 am (Reply)
I would like to start out by saying that I enjoyed this article immensely. However, in keeping with Jewish tradition I have some thoughts of my own.

I would have to disagree with the authors premise about the "Jewish" golem. The golem eventually turned on its creator and had to be destroyed before it destroyed "the people." It is not a symbol of Jewish power, but a symbol of human destruction. The golem was created out of fear, hate and a desire for revenge, albeit its purpose was to protect the people from harm. It was made not out of the postive side of the human spirit but of the negative and that is why it turned on its creators. In that way the golem of fiction is quite in keeping with the Jewish golem.In fact, Golem in the Lord of the Rings trilogy is perhaps the closest non-Jewish verson of a "Jewish" golem in literature; A creature once wholly human brought to inhumanity by its desire for everything evil, controlled by an otherworldly amulet that destroys the human soul.The essence of the Jewish Golem was not about the golem but about the soul of the Jewish people.

To also equate the term golem to "goyishe kupp" is also a stretch. Golem is not a negative in as much as it is a "stupid" creature but a violent one and one not of its own making.It has no responsibility for its creation nor its life nor its eventual end. Golem actually is retribution upon the Jewish people for their presumption of the ability to create life, especially life through the negative elements of the soul. On the other hand,"Goyishe kupp" in and of itself is an insult to someone's intelligence, it does not bring to mind the hold that the Christian world had over the Jews for milleniums but it brings to mind a person devoid of the ability to think and reason. The disdain one has for the "goyishe kupp" has more to do with the others refusal to take advantage of knowledge and that they are solely responsibile for their lack of education and ability to reason. It is disdain for the ones that are different-One made by a different culture, which does not necessarily emphasize what is considered important in the Jewish culture.

Lastly, technology as golem is also misassociated. The equation of the two, golem and technology, is because the golem was eventually uncontrollable by its creator. The fear of the Luddite is that the technology that we are creating is ultimately uncontrollable and will one day turn on us and destroy us as did the golem.(referenced HAL, or the Terminator series) However, technology is not a destructive force but a help-mate to civilization, it is what WE do with it, not what it does itself that is the key to the furture. Technology is ours to control, it is the human who invented technology that is uncontrollable and the unknown variable in the technology equation. The Golem is innocent really, as is technology. Ultimately, the poor golem of myth had no control over its creation nor its reaction to the world nor to its eventual demise.Once again it is the humans that made the golem that are at fault and bear the ultimate burden.
Elise Fischer on September 14, 2010 at 10:24 am (Reply)
Not to nitpick a side point you make, but Boris Karloff was/is NOT Frankenstein - he was the monster!
Linda Silver on September 14, 2010 at 10:40 am (Reply)
I want to refer readers - and the author of the article - to another article about the Golem, published in Modern Judaism 17 (1997), 1-23 entitled PURSUING THE GOLEM OF PRAGUE: JEWISH CULTURE AND THE INVENTION OF A TRADITION by Hillel J. Kieval. It differs in its interpretation of the Golem legend from Benjamin Kerstein's, published here. For one thing, it locates the site of the Golem's actions, Prague during the reign of the Emperor Rudolph II, and his creator and master, Rabbi Judah Loew, as late traditions, occurring sometime between the 17th and 19th centuries. This was centuries after instructions for making a golem were given by Rabbi Eleazar of Worms in the 12th-13th century and a report was written in 1674 on the practice of golem-making by Polish Jews. Most importantly, the association of the golem with anti-Semitism and the blood libel is a very recent addition to the legend, the result of what Kieval calls a literary forgery, written by a Polish rabbi named Yudel Rosenberg in the early 20th century. Kieval argues and I agree with him that earlier golem legends had to do with the dangers of hubris, of the internal dangers to a Jewish community within which God's role in creating life was usurped. Later versions re-cast the threat as coming from outside the Jewish community in the form of anti-Semitism.
aspacia on September 14, 2010 at 6:46 pm (Reply)
Interesting, but as a Goy, I resent the name Goyish Kup, which in effect claims the goyim are stupid.

Comments are closed for this article.

Like us on Facebook! Follow us on Twitter! Pin us on Pintrest!

Jewish Review of Books

Inheriting Abraham