Kabbalah and its Discontents

 

Aside from a small circle of students and admirers, Rabbi Yehuda Ashlag was an unknown figure at his death in 1954. Today, religious schools and New Age "educational centers" around the world are actively spreading his ideas, and his writings are being analyzed by professors and graduate students. After spending an hour in the rabbi's stone mausoleum, the pop-diva Madonna emerged with tears in her eyes. Who was this person to whom scores of pious (and impious) Jews and non-Jews are turning for inspiration?

Latter-Day Luminary  Micha OdenheimerHaaretzThe life and times of Yehuda Ashlag, who saw Judaism's esoteric tradition as the instrument for transforming both human consciousness and human society.  SAVE

Spiritual Materialism  Yehonatan GarbEretz AcheretNew Age movements traffic in mystical urgings to achieve material gain and cultural status.  SAVE

SAVE "Kabbalah and its Discontents"

Tu b'Shevat: What Sorts of Trees are We?

 

Deuteronomy 20, discussing the laws of war, and in particular siege, forbids the cutting down of fruit trees, adding, in an ambiguous and tantalizing phrase, "ki ha-adam etz ha-sadeh." The words can be translated as a simple if enigmatic statement ("for man is a tree of the field") or as a question (in the rendering of the JPS Torah,"are trees of the field human?"). The classical commentators were likewise divided. The Talmud, reading the phrase as a statement, is moved to offer a prototype of a human "tree of the field": a virtuous sage, a worthy teacher and role model. Rashi, the great exegete of medieval Franco-Germany, understood it as a question. People make war, but why should trees suffer? 

The Zohar has its own take. God, the ultimately inaccessible divine person, is knowable in this world through the tree of life: that is, the Torah. Indeed, humans, trees, Torah, God—all mirror each other, each in its own way bridging heaven and earth, maintaining itself while branching out and bearing fruit. This perspective lives on in modern Jewish thought and literature. 

Zionism gave still another response. The human tree is the new Jew, who in planting trees advances settlement of the Land and figuratively undoes the rootlessness of exile. It was Zionism more than anything else that called into being the contemporary holiday of Tu b'Shevat, which in modern times bears multiple connotations, including environmentalist ones, but in ancient times was simply a convenient date for gathering tithes on fruits.

So what sorts of trees are we humans? The great 17th-century moralist Maharal of Prague had an answer: upside-down trees, whose spiritual roots lie in heaven above, and whose far-reaching branches and twigs form us earthlings below.

The Great Tree  Meir PoppersIlan Ha-Gadol.  A 17th-century kabbalist sketches the spiritual universe.  SAVE

I Contemplate a Tree  Martin BuberI and Thou.  "I ought to approach a tree with a sense of its own living unity and wholeness, to the point where I can call a tree ‘you.'"  SAVE

Man is the Tree of the Field  Natan ZachFor Man is a Tree of the Field.  A contemporary Israeli poet seeks a grim comfort in the arboreal bond. A song based on the poem is performed by Shalom Hanoch.  SAVE

SAVE "Tu b'Shevat: What Sorts of Trees are We?"

The Harshness of Creation

 

Like the 2004 tsunami that devastated southeast Asia, yesterday's catastrophic earthquake in Haiti, a poverty-stricken country with a legacy of home-grown violence and suffering, inevitably provoked the terrible question: where was God?

One answer derives from Jewish religious sources, and specifically from the teachings of the Kabbalah. It has to do with tzimtzum, or contraction: that is, God's own contraction and limitation of Himself in order to make space for the finite—and invariably flawed—worlds of physical nature and human action. The idea was most famously developed in Safed, Palestine by the 16th-century kabbalist Isaac Luria as part of a complicated, esoteric myth of cataclysm, creation, and the direction of world history.

Despite its obscure origins, tzimtzum has proved surprisingly resonant to contemporary Jewish thinkers who find meaning in it for everything from organizational life to individual psychology. The very qualities that made it quasi-heretical in the 16th century—particularly its overturning of hallowed notions of divine providence and omnipotence—make it appealing today, including in attempts to explain otherwise inexplicable acts of mass evil or natural disaster.

And yet it was precisely in order to "justify the ways of God to man" that the idea of tzimtzum came into being, and there it will stand or fall. That, at least, was the view of the late philosopher Hans Jonas, and a similar view seems to underlie the German painter Anselm Kiefer's ambiguous rendering of the concept.

This may be an overly abstract or equivocal foundation on which to construct an argument for religious belief and practice. But in an age marked by scientific rationalism, a mistrust of hierarchy, and confusion begotten by historical trauma, a limited God may be all the God that some can bear.

A Kabbalistic Approach to Creation  Rachel EliorSh'ma.  Ideas developed to explain destruction and exile led the way to theories of restoration and redemption.  SAVE

God After Auschwitz  Hans JonasJournal of Religion.  A portrait of God as existential hero, whose "bitter honesty" should win Him whatever allegiance we can offer.  SAVE

On “ZimZum”  Rita ValenciaTimes Quotidian.  Kiefer's painting powerfully conveys despair, with a tincture of divine hope.  SAVE

SAVE "The Harshness of Creation"

Insight & Analysis

A Priceless Manuscript Goes Online  Braginsky Collection.  Containing comments on the Zohar, the classic work of Jewish mysticism, this is one of only four authentic documents by the hand of the Gaon of Vilna (1720–1797).  SAVE

Powered by eResources